| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 454 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
C.L. Muthiah vs Power Soaps (P) Ltd.
Maintainability of Complaint-Manner of calculation of statutory notice period-The manner of calculation of the statutory notice period and the time within which the complaint was to be filed, the reasons for the receipt or non-r [LexDoc Id : 395526]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Kakku E and P Control (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs ROC
[LexDoc Id : 395244]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Radhabari Tea Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mridul Kumar Bhattacharjee and Ors.
Specific Relief Act 1963: Mandatory injunction-Performance of obligation compelled only by a decree for specific performance-Mandatory injunction could be granted by a court only when the court was required to prevent breach of an obligation. Performance of an obligation, wh [LexDoc Id : 389529]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2009 |
Sohal Agencies (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs ROC
[LexDoc Id : 388904]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
V.S. Gupta vs Punjab National Bank
Person in charge and responsible to the company-Appearance or submission of compromise on behalf of company-A consultant could not be said to be a person in charge of and responsible to the company for conduct of the business of the company. Merely from appe [LexDoc Id : 395522]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
A.C. Karthikeyan vs Sunil Shastri and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 385307]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Tamil Nadu Water Investment Co. Ltd. and Ors. (No. 2) vs Aidqua Holdings (Mauritius) Inc. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 385305]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Tamil Nadu Water Investment Co. Ltd. and Ors. (No. 1) vs Aidqua Holdings (Mauritius) Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 385304]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Ajit Singh vs ROC
Power of the court to grant relief in certain cases-Proceedings under Indian Penal Code-An FIR was lodged with the CBI under s.120B, s.420, s.467, s.468, s.471 and s.477A of the Indian Penal Code 1860 against a chartered accountant of the [LexDoc Id : 389522]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
B. Ramachandra Adityan vs Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Association and Ors.
Annual general meetings-Election of directors-The agenda relating to election of directors had been postponed. The high court had extended the time for holding the 83rd, 84th and 85th AGMs and tho [LexDoc Id : 386174]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
B. Ramachandra Adityan vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Association and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 384821]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Regional Director and Anr. vs Mphasis Ltd.
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Increase of authorized capital fees-The company judge had rejected the objections raised by the appellants and sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation of the transferor-company with the re [LexDoc Id : 383523]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
Kriti Industries India Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Unanimous approval of shareholders and unsecured creditors-The petitioner-companies i.e. the transferor-company, first transferee-company and second transferee-company had filed a petition seeking sanction of [LexDoc Id : 385179]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
E-City Media (P) Ltd. vs Sadhrta Retail Ltd.
Winding up: Grounds-Inability to pay debt-The high court held that the petition for winding up was not maintainable. A debt would become crystallised only upon an adjudication of damages in a [LexDoc Id : 377121]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Cheran Holdings (P) Ltd., Sporting Pastime India Ltd. and Anr. vs Data Access (India) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 376890]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Al-Ahali Business Trade Links (P) Ltd., In re
Reduction of share capital and conversion thereof as unsecured loans-Scheme of compromise or arrangement with the shareholders-The high court, on the question whether it was proper on the part of the petitioner to seek sanction for reduction of share capital under s.100 of the [LexDoc Id : 386422]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
Ganesh Synthetics (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of arrangement: Sanction of court-Scheme seeking conversion of debt into equity-The petitioner-companies i.e. the transferor-companies and the transferee-company sought sanction of their scheme of arrangement in terms of which the [LexDoc Id : 389527]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Rubber Udyog Sharmik Union vs Ralson Industries Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 388365]
|
DRAT (Allahabad) |
2009 |
CCE vs Elgi Ultra Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 382351]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
Sukhchain Singh and Pargatsingh Dhindsa Land Developers (P) Ltd. vs Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400844]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Paragatsingh Dhindsa Land Developers (P) Ltd. vs Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd.
Appeal against order: Order of company judge-Appeal to Division Bench-An appeal against an order of the company judge against the orders passed in exercise of original jurisdiction would lie to a Division Bench. [LexDoc Id : 387799]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Ravi Kiran Agarwal, Pujit Aggarwal and Anr. vs Moolchand Shah, Chunnilal Shah, Raksha Shah, Bharat Shah, Chetan Consultants (P) Ltd., Ramesh Bhimani, Mafatlal S. Bafna, Rajendra Bafna, Vidya Pravin Balota, Kaliash Bafna and Chetan Bafna
Oppression and mismanagement: Petition for relief-Erroneous interpretation of s.405 by CLB, CLB order set aside, Matter remitted-The appellants claimed to have a right, title and interest in 1200 equity shares of the company representing 60 percent of the equity capital and in t [LexDoc Id : 377221]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Vijay Kumar Narang and Ors. vs Prakash Coach Builders (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Oppression and mismanagement: Issuance of additional shares only in favour of two shareholders-Qualifying part of s.397(2)(b) only with reference to former part of s.397(2)(a) and not necessarily with reference to later part of oppressing conduct-The respondent-company was required to issue additional shares in favour of its members to ensure compliance with the requirements of s.313 of the Com [LexDoc Id : 425948]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
TRS Forms and Services (P) Ltd. vs Eduquity Technologies (P) Ltd.
Winding up: Grounds-Inability to pay debts-The high court rejected the petition as there was no dispute that the respondent was due to the petitioner for Rs.11 lakhs. The machinery of winding u [LexDoc Id : 383278]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
Vasu Tech Ltd. vs Ratna Commercial Enterprises Ltd.
Indian Contract Act 1872: Novation and its kinds-Complete substitution of new contract in place of old-One of the essential requirements of novation was that there should be complete substitution of a new contract in place of the old. It was in that sit [LexDoc Id : 392231]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
